logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2020.12.17 2020고단2538
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(음란물유포)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, using “B,” a web site, engaged in obscene video works in which both men and women are sexually related, using “IdD”, thereby having received points given by an unspecified member at each time when he/she downloads his/her obscene video works, and received points given by the said website operator and received profits by exchanging them in cash.

On August 30, 2018, the Defendant opened a total of 948 obscene video works, as shown in the list of crimes, from that time until February 20, 2019, with the title of “F” (Ttain number: G) in the category of “F” (Ttain number) that connects the said clinic from Pakistan to that of “19 persons.”

Accordingly, the Defendant distributed obscene video works through information and communication network.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the B Hague-based seizure information and evidence collection-related APDF file Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Article 74(1)2 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. of Criminal Facts and Articles 44-7(1)1 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Punishment, Etc. (generally, a prosecutor was indicted concurrently with a prosecutor, but it is reasonable to view that the crime is a blanket crime in light of the unity of the criminal intent, method of the crime and the identity of the place for the crime) and Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on Suspension of Execution of the Punishment of Imprisonment with Labor (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007Da144411, Apr. 2, 201).

arrow