logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 해남지원 2016.03.10 2015고단559
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On November 26, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on August 26, 2015 for injury and special intimidation in the Southern Branch of the Gwangju District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 4, 2015.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act is a person who is engaged in driving a F non-land car.

On October 16:50 on December 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven the said car and proceeded in the direction of the office of North-Myeon in the village of the city of North-dong in the north-dong in accordance with the ero-ro, the Defendant neglected to perform his duties at a point where the amount of approximately 300 meters falls short of the 300 meters from the office of North-do; (b) neglected to perform his duties at all times; (c) caused the Defendant’s negligence in the course of driving the automobile of HWz driven driven by the victim G (66 years) who driven along his lane in accordance with his lane in the direction of the Defendant’s course by negligence in the course of driving the vehicle of the vehicle of North-do in the direction of the Defendant (66 years). At the same time, at the same time, the Defendant damaged the above erogating part of the driver’s seat of the vehicle of North-do in the front part of the driver’s seat of the vehicle of North Korea by taking about two weeks.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Insurance shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

On October 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was a person holding a F non-stop car that was not covered by mandatory insurance; (b) operated the said non-stop car in the section of approximately 5.5 km from the Do in front of the village in North-west, west-gun, west-do to the adjacent area of the Do in the same area.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A written diagnosis (G), written estimate (H);

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident (1st), a report on the actual condition of a traffic accident, and two actual survey reports;

1. A rough map at the scene of an accident, and traffic accident evidence and photographs;

1. Mandatory insurance inquiries (22 beams 9247);

1. Previous convictions in its ruling: A inquiry letter, such as criminal history, and a report of investigation (the latest judgment has been rendered);

arrow