Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is operating D as a representative of the Gyeonggi C Association (hereinafter “C Association”).

On November 4, 2016, the Defendant was accused of “no suspicion” of embezzlement by the representatives of the instant C Association, including the Defendant, at the branch office of the Do government branch office of the public prosecutor’s office of this case on November 4, 2016. The Defendant did not refuse to submit data in the process of investigation by the prosecutor, and even though the Defendant was aware of such fact, the Defendant, despite being aware of the fact, on the Internet access page consisting of members of the instant Association, will be well-being.

I would like to know the truth.

The title "I confirmed that the account of the President of the Ethical Republic of Korea was the result of this study for the victims."

The investigator's demand that the investigator could not confirm more than 30 minutes, but there have been a lot of doubtful parts.

In addition, the amount has much more parts than that confirmed until now.

If the executive body decides, it should be clarified how public funds were used in advance, but the executive body refused to submit the next data by the prosecution.

1. The phrase “ ...........” was written differently from the fact.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the honor of victims by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1. The photograph of the broadband screen attached to the complaint on November 9, 2016 (Evidence No. 26-29 pages)

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (additional evidence and the submission of power of attorney);

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. As to the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.