A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. On April 22, 2002, the Defendant against the victim E, at the “G office” office actually operated by the victim E, located in the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F Building 1106 around April 22, 2002, the Defendant would pay the price to the victim “if the Defendant is operating the household factory at the Si of China, and if the Defendant supplied the household house to the victim on credit, the price would be paid two months after the date.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the fact is that the household factory operated by the defendant at the time has not been properly paid the employee's benefits, and even if the household is supplied with the raw materials for launch from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to pay the cost.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received the original intent equivalent to KRW 12,195,040 on April 22, 2002 from the victim, for the purpose of provisional launch, and the supply price of KRW 30,968,437 on May 28, 2002, and the original intent for provisional launch and the supply price of KRW 5,742,00 on the basis of KRW 5,742,00 on the supply price, respectively, and acquired the original intent for provisional launch equivalent to KRW 48,905,47 on April 22, 200.

B. On July 30, 2002, the criminal defendant against the victim H was operated by the victim H in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on July 30, 2002 at the “J” restaurant operated by the victim H, “The victim is operating the provisional factory in China, and the purchase price for the provisional launch house is required.

On September 30, 2002, the interest and interest will be paid with the loan of money until September 30, 2002.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay money even if he borrowed money from the injured party in excess of his obligation as set forth in the above A.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received cash of KRW 20 million from the damaged party immediately from the damaged party and acquired it by fraud.

2. On November 12, 2002, the Defendant violated the Illegal Table Control Act under the name of the company operated by the branch office of the foreign exchange bank and the Defendant in Jung-gu, Seoul.