A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 25, 2015, at around 01:15, the Defendant 01:15, after eating food on the packing cel operated by the victim C (W, 66 years of age) in front of the Seoul Northernbuk-gu, and demanded the payment of the price, the Defendant c took on the hand floor of the victim C at one time, and c took the face of the victim C with his/her finger hand, so he/she was unable to take the face. The victim D (W, 46 years of age) who was a customer of the above packing cel, she turned the victim D's face at one time by drinking, and turned out the victim D's body with his/her hand.

As a result, the Defendant committed so-called knee kne knee kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C or D;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (Evidence List, Nos. 9, 10, 13 through 15);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of applicable sentences under Acts: one month to six months;

2. Where the mitigation area (two to one year), the mitigation area (two to one year), the punishment of a person not subject to punishment (including advanced efforts for recovery of damage), or considerable damage has been recovered, in the application of the sentencing guidelines (the scope of recommending punishment on July 1, 2015) (the scope of recommending punishment) (the scope of general injury) or considerable damage has been mitigated;

3. The fact that the defendant, who was sentenced to punishment for the same kind of crime, committed the crime in this case again even though there have been many records of punishment, and the fact that the victim, who was demanded to drink alcohol and calculate the drinking value, uses a non-discriminatory violence. However, the fact that the defendant is willing to not repeat the crime and to not repeat the crime, and that the defendant agreed with the victims.