1. The Defendant’s KRW 38,00,000 and the Plaintiff’s 20% per annum from October 11, 2008 to May 16, 2017, and the following.

1. In full view of the purport of the argument in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 4 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff loaned a total of KRW 50 million to the defendant on August 31, 2003, KRW 50 million on September 5, 2003, KRW 58 million on November 10, 2003, and KRW 38 million on November 10, 2003, and KRW 20 million, the defendant paid the remainder of KRW 38 million and did not pay the remainder of KRW 38 million on August 29, 2008, upon the plaintiff's request for the payment order of the loan of this case against the defendant on August 29, 2008, "the defendant paid the plaintiff KRW 38 million and delay damages calculated on September 208, 200," and the above fact can be acknowledged as being delivered to the defendant on August 28, 2008, respectively.

According to the above facts, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 38 million and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum as stipulated in the above payment order from October 11, 2008 to May 16, 2017 when the copy of the complaint of this case was served on the Plaintiff from October 11, 2008 following the service of the above payment order, and 15% per annum as stipulated in the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the day of full

2. The plaintiff's claim for the conclusion is legitimate, and the plaintiff's claim is acceptable in its entirety. The plaintiff's claim for the conclusion is justified.