The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The penalty (one million won of fine) declared by the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances should be considered in favor of the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized his mistake and reflects the victim’s damage, the fact that the victim E and the victim were smoothly agreed, and the fact that there seems to be some circumstances to consider the background of the crime of embezzlement.

However, in full view of the circumstances that are disadvantageous to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant was committed during the period of repeated crime, the crime of fraud under the same law as this case, the crime of this case, and the crime of this case again was committed more than one month after being sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor due to the violation of the Employment Security Act, and the fact that there were several times of punishment, including the fact that the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime, and the fact that there were several times of punishment, it is not deemed that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable because it is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.