1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 201, 201, the Plaintiff entered the Incheon National University B and was enrolled in the third grade as of September 2, 2013 while staying there until now as a foreigner with Mongolian nationality and staying there as a stay status in study (D22).

B. On March 4, 2014, the Plaintiff was issued a disposition not to institute a prosecution on the grounds that he/she purchased a comprehensive insurance policy in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, No. 2014, No. 17041, Incheon District Public Prosecutor’s Office of Education, on the ground that he/she was subscribed to a comprehensive insurance policy on March 4, 2014, on the ground that he/she was engaged in a comprehensive insurance policy on the ground that he/she had been engaged in a comprehensive insurance policy on the ground that he/she was engaged in a comprehensive insurance policy on the ground that he/she was engaged in a comprehensive insurance policy in the case of violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, No. 2014, No. 17041.

다. 원고는 “2016. 1. 8. 05:30경 오토바이를 운전하여 인천 남구 경인로 석암지하차도를 간석동 방면에서 주안역 방향으로 역주행 진행하다가 정상 차로를 따로 1차로와 2차로를 주행하는 승용차 2대를 연이어 충격하는 교통사고로 부상을 입어 병원 응급실로 후송되었는데, 병원 응급실에 출동한 경찰관이 침대에 누워있는 원고에게 음주감지기를 사용한 결과 음주가 감지되어 음주측정기를 이용한 음주측정을 요구하였으나, 06:00부터 06:35경까지 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣은 시늉만하는 방법으로 정당한 사유 없이 음주측정에 불응하였다.”는 범죄사실로 2016. 2. 8. 이 법원 2016고약2087호 도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)으로 벌금 500만 원의 약식명령을 발령받고 정식재판을 청구하였으나, 2016. 4. 22. 정식재판을 취하하여 위 약식명령이 확정되었다. 라.

The defendant on May 1, 2016 based on Article 68(1)1, Article 46(1)3, and Article 11(1)3 and 4 of the Immigration Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Act").