logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.05.15 2013고정898
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the head of the site office who has been performing the construction work of new house owned by the victim D in the Cheongbuk-do Cheongbuk-gun C, and E is the defendant who introduced the victim's new house construction work, and F, G, H, and I are the construction business operators of the above new house construction work.

The victim requested the defendant to construct the above new house, but the construction work has been in progress, so the defendant's construction has been suspended due to disputes over the construction work cost, and again requested another construction business operator to construct the above new house.

Accordingly, the defendant, E, F, G, H, and I found it at the construction site of the above house for the purpose of receiving part of the work cost not received from the victim, and tried to interfere with the construction work of the house conducted by another construction business operator.

On July 26, 2012, the Defendant found the aforementioned E, F, G, H, and I as the site for new construction of housing on July 10, 2010 to 21:00, and on July 27, 2012, the Defendant moved the compact presses and the framework used for the construction work on the second floor of the said housing into the first floor, and the construction business operator J, etc., who is in progress, carrying the seals, etc. into the first floor, threatening the said K to the effect that “I Y, E, E, Chewing, rings, and dies during the construction work,” and then, to the said construction business operator to prevent such new construction work from spreading, and to the said construction business operator from spreading the above water at the construction site, and to the said construction business operator to prevent such new construction work.”

Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with the above E, F, G, H, and I, thereby obstructing the victim's new housing construction work by force.

arrow