logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.08.16 2016누36651
취득세 등 경정거부처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: " 3, 6, 7" is added to " 3, 6, and 3, 7" to "3, 7, and 7, and "A" to "7, 9," and "the 7, 2, Paragraph 1 of Article 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Establishment and Operation of Public Interest Corporations refers to a corporation for the following business purposes. Article 2 (1) of the Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Establishment and Operation of Public Interest Corporations provides that "a public corporation shall establish, operate, or support goods, services, or facilities in lieu of funds for the scholarship of students, etc. regardless of its name," and Article 9 (3) of the Act provides that "no special reserve fund of U.S. shall be excluded from the budget for the special reserve fund related to the scholarship project," and Article 8 (2) of the Civil Procedure Act shall be cited as it is for each court's reasons for 9, Paragraph 2, Article 20 of the Civil Procedure Act."

2. The judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow