logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.11.30 2016고단1732
무고
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 1, 2016, the Defendant submitted a written complaint to the public prosecutor’s office of Daejeon District Public Prosecutor’s Office, stating that “On March 23, 2016, 10:30, the Defendant: “On March 23, 2016,” “In the office of D Licensed Real Estate Agent’s Office (“D Licensed Real Estate Agent’s Office”, the head of Dong-si C, Commercial Building 201 and 107, the head of Dong-si and Dong-si’s face and wus wus at a large number of assaulted, resulting in the Defendant’s injury of satisf, and thus punished E.

However, in fact, at the time and place of the complaint, there was only the fact that the defendant fats and fats the eat, and there was no fact that E did not use violence against the defendant.

As a result, the defendant, for the purpose of criminal punishment of E, dismissed E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. A complaint;

1. A report on the preparation of a witness cd 1 copy of the video taken by a witness F, a recording of a video recording and a recording of a recording [a criminal fact is denied; (1) a witness E or F consistent and specific statement; (2) a witness E or a specific statement; (3) there is no evidence suggesting that F operated or d d f operated the above video; (E did not file a complaint or report after March 23, 2016; and (5) a cell phone image was submitted to the police only after an investigation was made by the defendant after receiving a complaint from the defendant; and (4) the defendant received a report on credit from the prosecutor’s office and submitted it to the police without any reason to manipulate the above video; and (5) the defendant did not receive an examination from the prosecutor’s office as a witness at the time of receipt of the report on credit without any reason, and (3) the defendant did not receive an examination from the prosecutor’s office at the time of receipt of the report.”

arrow