The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (two years of imprisonment, confiscation) on the summary of the reasons for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant’s crime of this case was committed with the victim’s mobile phone destroyed the victim’s mobile phone on the ground that the victim was not contacted or refused to accept the judgment. In light of the victim’s faces, face, side gate, etc., the Defendant injured the victim by using knife, knife, wree, wree, wre, etc., which are dangerous articles, and detained the victim by using knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, etc., the motive and knife of the crime were weak and the method of the crime

The crime of this case appears to have suffered serious physical and mental pain, and the court below submitted a letter of agreement with the victim in the name of the victim, but the victim seems to have prepared a letter of retaliation rather than due to the fact that the defendant divided the truth into a truth and sought a letter of apology.

In full view of the aforementioned circumstances and other circumstances indicated in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct and environment, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, even considering the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime, and that the Defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the suspended sentence, the sentence imposed by the lower court is appropriate and that the lower court’s judgment exceeded the reasonable bounds of discretion.

There are no circumstances such as evaluation or maintenance of it is deemed unfair.

Therefore, since the punishment imposed by the court below is too excessive and it cannot be deemed unfair, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.