logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.14 2016나35559
구상금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded an automobile insurance contract with respect to A vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is an insurer who has concluded an automobile insurance contract with respect to B vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B. Around 16:40 on May 15, 2015, the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, who driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle and carried the part of the front front part of the Defendant’s vehicle located in the direction of the right-way during the right-hand phase while driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle in the vicinity D located in C at Heunging City, was shocked with the front front part of the Plaintiff’s driver’s seat.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

On June 5, 2015, the Plaintiff paid insurance proceeds of KRW 12,790,000 at the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 3, or the purport of whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence mentioned above, the defendant vehicle was moving straight along the two-lanes of the two-lanes, the vehicle of the plaintiff was moving straighten along the two-lanes, and the vehicle of the plaintiff was moving straighten to the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the way through which only one vehicle can pass, the vehicle of the plaintiff was normally straighten in accordance with green name, the vehicle of the plaintiff was normally straightened at the time of the accident of this case, the weather at the time of the accident of this case was p.m. and the day weather at the time did not have difficulty in securing clear and visible, and it is difficult for either party to first enter the intersection when considering the shock level of the plaintiff vehicle and the defendant vehicle's shock, etc., it is recognized that the accident of this case was caused by the negligence of the driver of the plaintiff vehicle of the vehicle of this case who failed to take into account the traffic situation of the vehicle of this case while attempting to move to a right way, and the situation and result of the accident of this case.

(b) therefore.

arrow