1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person working in Korea Loan Co., Ltd., and the Defendant is a mutual aid business operator who entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to Sampoe Tourist C bus operated by Nonparty B (hereinafter “instant bus”).

B. On April 22, 2016, the Plaintiff was on board and retired from the instant bus, a transit bus, and the same day. On the same day, the Plaintiff left the instant bus before Sacheon-si D.

In the process of beyond 8 weeks, the injury to the right pellleys, etc. (hereinafter “the injury in this case”) which requires treatment was suffered.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's statements in Gap's 1 to 3, 7, 9 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The Plaintiff’s alleged bus engineer has a duty of care to verify whether or not the said passenger was under the influence of alcohol, and to examine and operate the surrounding area in the event that the passenger was under the influence of alcohol.

Nevertheless, the bus engineer of this case asserts that since the bus driver violated the above duty of care and without taking any measures despite the Plaintiff's getting out of the bus, the bus rapidly starts with the bus and the Plaintiff's engine was divided into or divided into the wheels of the bus vehicle, and the injury of this case occurred, the Defendant is liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the Plaintiff.

나. 판단 살피건대, 을 제1호증의 영상 및 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하여 알 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정들, 즉 ① 이 사건 버스기사는 사고 장소에 이 사건 버스를 완전히 정차한 후 원고가 하차하도록 하였는데, 원고가 위 버스에서 하차하던 중 도로에 발을 딛는 과정에서 중심을 잃고 넘어진 점, ② 이 사건 버스기사는 원고가 하차 후 위와 같이 위 사고 장소에 넘어져 있는 상태에서 위 버스를 출발한 점, ③ 원고는 위 버스가 출발하자 스스로 도로에서 일어나 출발하고 있는 위 버스를 �아가다가 위 버스에 자신의 몸을 충돌하게 하고 다시 도로에...