(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.01.06 2014고정610

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.01.06 2014고정610

업무방해

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on June 25, 2013, the Suwon District Court was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of eight months of imprisonment for occupational breach of trust in the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch for the crime of occupational breach of trust, and the said judgment becomes final and conclusive on July 3, 2013.

Defendant

A, around 10:17 September 1, 2012, the Defendant received a written notification from the victim E Co., Ltd. to the effect that “On the grounds that there is no notification of the computer program password from the victim Co., Ltd., the victim Co., Ltd. continues to be seriously damaged due to the failure to inform the company of all passwords,” but only the Defendant refused the above password by a picture known to the company, thereby obstructing the victim’s management by force by delaying the service of calculating the victim’s benefits.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Legal statement of witness F and G in part;

1. Each protocol of suspect examination of Defendant A by prosecution and police;

1. Previous convictions: Criminal records, written judgments (occupational Breach of Trust) and search results of integrated cases claimed that the defendant did not request the victim to inform him/her of the password. However, according to the above evidence, the defendant, who is the chief of the accounting division, had changed the password from time to time while managing the "PersonnelCB" program, and requested the defendant to inform him/her of the above password. Since the defendant did not notify him/her of his/her identification number, the victim company failed to perform duties such as paying wages for a considerable period of time, and the defendant was found to have restored the password through the specialized management company. Accordingly, according to the above acknowledged facts, the defendant, who was working as the chief of the accounting division at the victim company, could sufficiently recognize that his/her business would be impeded if he/she did not properly implement the procedure of transferring the password related to the benefits and personnel program, and thus, interference with the defendant'

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.01.06 2014고단1866

-수원지방법원 2015.06.17 2014노6847

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.11.04 2014고정340

-서울서부지방법원 2015.07.09 2014노822

-부산지방법원동부지원 2020.04.21 2019가단4108