A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Seized evidence 6 or 7 shall be confiscated from the accused.

seizure.

Punishment of the crime

The attached list of crimes attached to a bill of indictment is not disputed by the defendant but is in large amount, so this judgment is replaced by attaching a file of a list of crimes in this judgment.

around 13:30 on June 29, 2018, the Defendant discovered that there was no locking device in which the victim F, who was on the first floor of the building in Mapo-gu, Mapo-gu, Seoul and Hong-ro, 94 Hong-ro, Hong-ro, 1, K, 1,000, kept a major book, etc., and brought about the right of theft of the latest machinery and vibration equivalent to approximately 110,000 won in the market price owned by the said victim in the object, from July 29, 2011 to June 29, 2018, the Defendant brought about the right of theft of the materials equivalent to approximately KRW 164,69,27,69,27, as in the sum of the crimes list 1,2, and 3 second, as in the list of crimes, 1,69,27,687, 987.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen another's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Protocols of police seizure and list of seizure;

1. A report on investigation (verification of sales details at Allars, Reading Centers of the victim, and Allars);

1. Details on the sale of victim F's photographics and secondhand books damaged by theft;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the method of crime, frequency of crime, and the fact that the same kind of crime has been committed systematically for several years;

1. Articles 332 and 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The crime of this case has been repeatedly committed even though the suspension of indictment was imposed for the same kind of crime as the sentencing of Article 333(1) of the Victim Return Criminal Procedure Act, in light of the fact that university students' teaching materials have been stolen for seven years and received profits exceeding KRW 160 million, and thus the nature of the crime is not good, and the damage has not been recovered at all, the punishment should be imposed.