A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of CPoter cargo vehicles;

On October 23, 2013, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle around 23:00, while proceeding in the right way from the center to the center of short-term residents in the short-term area of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the Gu.

At that time, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol 0.156%, was in an inaccurate state of drinking, was in a state of difficulty in normal driving under the influence of alcohol, such as being sniffed within one meter, being sniffed, and walking is not normal. In such a case, the Defendant was installed at a crosswalk at the front section. In such a case, the Defendant was prohibited from driving, and there was a duty of care to check whether there was a person who is making a driving under the influence of reducing speed and checking well the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting the front-round situation, and the victim D (the age of 33) was placed on the road along the front-round crosswalk of the Defendant’s driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant driven under the influence of alcohol that it is difficult to drive normally due to the influence of alcohol, and suffered injury to the victim, such as the right-hand abandonment, which requires medical treatment for about ten weeks.

2. Around 23:00 on October 23, 2013, the Defendant driven C Poter Cargo Vehicles with a blood alcohol concentration of about 1km from the 1km section to the roads in front of such Central Road as from the Hanju-dong short-gu KT-dong, Nowon-gu, Seoul to the roads in front of such Central Road, with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.156%.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act operated the cargo vehicles stated in Paragraph 2, which were not covered by mandatory insurance, at the time and place stated in Paragraph 2.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A report on whether to drive at risk, and a blood alcohol appraisal report;