1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to KRW 118,512,632 and KRW 27,773,582 of them:

B. Defendant B is Defendant A.

1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant A

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. According to the overall purport of evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including branch numbers) of judgment on claims against Defendant B, C, and D, Defendant A obtained loans, etc. from financial institutions listed below (hereinafter “creditor financial institutions”) and lost the benefit of time. Meanwhile, the network E entered into a joint and several guarantee agreement as listed below, and Defendant A’s obligation under the above agreement until May 8, 2015 as of the base date, the following facts are as follows: (i) the Plaintiff’s delayed damages were 17% per annum; (ii) the National Bank transferred the claims against Defendant A; and (iii) upon delegation of the notification of the assignment of claims to the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant A of this fact; and (iv) the National Bank filed a lawsuit against Defendant A and deceased on June 10, 2005; and (v) reported in favor of the case on June 10, 2005 and reported in favor of the Defendants to the Seoul Family Court by the heir No. 2016, Jun. 27, 2017.

According to the above facts of recognition as follows: (a) interest accrued from delay in the balance of loans extended to a financial institution is 27,773,58290,739,050 118,512,632 E by the National Bank of Korea; (b) the above Defendants are obligated to perform joint and several liability obligations to the Plaintiff according to their respective inheritance shares within the scope of the property inherited from the network E.

(The national bank's claims against the network E are claims established by judgment and the prescription period is ten years, so the defendants' defense of extinctive prescription is without merit).