logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.01.09 2017노6591
도시및주거환경정비법위반
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of legal principles) falls under the agreement that the Defendant concluded with C around July 29, 2015 on behalf of the E association on behalf of the Defendant on behalf of the E association on the debt repayment agreement concluded with C around July 29, 2015, separate from the obligation owed to G Co., Ltd. of the said association, the Defendant borrowed funds without obtaining a resolution of the general meeting of the members.

Nevertheless, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The lower court found the Defendant not guilty of the facts charged in this case, stating the grounds in detail.

Examining the above judgment of the court below in comparison with the evidence duly adopted and examined, the judgment is just, and there is no error by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit.

arrow