beta
Text
1. The defendant
A. As to KRW 110,529,228 among Plaintiff A and KRW 91,453,730 among them, the amount of KRW 110,529,228 among them shall be from November 19, 2016 to September 5, 2017.
Reasons
1. Attached Form of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;
2. Part concerning claims to increase compensation for losses;
A. 1) Project name, including the details of adjudication, etc. 1) project approval and notification: C Housing Redevelopment Project (hereinafter “instant project”): Public notification of project approval for the implementation of the project: D2 of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government public notification of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Land Tribunal on August 30, 2012: The date of commencement of expropriation as of September 30, 2016: each of the following land or shares in the project area in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government subject to expropriation and each of the above land obstacles (hereinafter “instant real estate”).
(1) (i) Plaintiff A - E, and F - Handets of obstacles, such as each of the above land’s ground buildings, etc. - Plaintiff B - G land - Plaintiff A: 1,409,94,700 won (hereinafter “Plaintiff B”: 1,029,830,00 won): An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation (hereinafter “adjudication appraiser”) 1,429,830,00 won; and the result of the appraisal is “the result of the appraisal”.
3) Plaintiff A: (a) Plaintiff B: (a) the result of the appraiser H’s appraisal (hereinafter the above appraiser is referred to as “court appraiser”; (b) the result of the appraiser’s appraisal is referred to as “court appraiser’s appraisal; (c) Plaintiff B: (a) there is no dispute over KRW 1,041,821,50 (based on recognition); (d) each entry of the evidence No. 6 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply); (c) the result of the appraisal commission to appraiser H; and (d) the purport of the entire pleadings;
B. 1) The plaintiffs' assertion and determination 1) since the plaintiffs' assertion and appraisal appraiser calculates the under-paid compensation by excessively lowering the value of the instant real estate, the defendant should additionally pay the difference between the reasonable compensation according to the result of the court appraisal and the compensation according to the result of the adjudication. 2) In the lawsuit on the increase or decrease of the compensation for expropriation, each appraisal institution's appraisal and appraisal selected by the court are not unlawful in the evaluation method.