logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2012.09.17 2011고단1067
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 3, 201, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) without obtaining a driver’s license under the influence of alcohol level of 0.177% at around 12:00, and driving B freight in the section of approximately 1.5 km at the road located in the same Si/Gun/Gu of permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, at around 16:26 on September 17, 2010, the Defendant operated the foregoing cargo vehicle B owned by the Defendant, each of which was not covered by mandatory insurance on the road located in the permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent permanent

Summary of Evidence

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused;

1. The provisions of Acts and subordinate statutes shall apply to inquiry into driver's licenses, inquiry into the results of the control of drinking driving, and investigation reports;

1. Article 148-2 Subparag. 1, Article 44(1) of the former Road Traffic Act (amended by Act No. 10790, Jun. 8, 201); Article 152 Subparag. 1, and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (amended by Act No. 11369, Feb. 22, 2012); Article 46(2), and Article 8 of the former Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (amended by Act No. 11369, Feb. 22, 2012); the choice of imprisonment with labor

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. The reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders are as follows: (a) even if the defendant had a record of being punished several times, he/she committed the same crime; (b) and (c) he/she seems to have continuously been driving the motor vehicle of this case with the same type of license.

arrow