All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court, on the grounds as indicated in its reasoning, did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence concerning the crime of larceny, or by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence as to the crime of larceny, as otherwise alleged in its reasoning, in so determining, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of logic and experience as to the crime of intrusion on residence and larceny (excluding the part concerning the theft of money rent contract equivalent to KRW 3 billion among the larceny on November 26, 2010), defamation, intimidation, and intimidation, obstruction of business around November 22, 2010, May 25, 2010, and November 28, 2010, and KRW 770 million around September 20, 2010, and USD 13,000 or KRW 18,000,000 or KRW 10,000 [the part concerning the crime of larceny].

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on the grounds of appeal by the prosecutor in light of the records, the lower court is justifiable to have rendered a not guilty verdict on the remainder of the facts charged except for the aforementioned guilty portion among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds as indicated in its reasoning, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules,

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.