A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Since August 9, 2010, the Defendant received an unjust solicitation to pay KRW 200,000 per 1 unit of the supplied vehicle (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.”) to the management director of the C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.”) (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.”) who works as a management director for the construction of the product, in violation of the duty to raise an objection to or suspend the delivery of the supplied vehicle, despite the fact that there is an occupational duty to make the supplier raise an objection to the miter C’s fuel, which is a fuel for the construction of the product, in the process of using the miter C, which is a fuel for the construction of the product. On August 5, 2014, the Defendant in violation of the duty to make the supplier raise an objection to the miter C, which is the main agent of the D Co., Ltd. (State)’s (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.), and received the total amount of KRW 300,000,000 from the Defendant’s Saemaul account (F: F.) to the 281.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Copy of each protocol concerning the examination of suspect with respect to E or G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (Attachment of D rebates), details of account transactions, investigation report (C Representative H phone Survey), investigation report (I mobile phone Kakao Stockholm conversation related to the receipt of breach of trust), investigation report (a judgment on public crimes E, etc.);

1. Relevant Article 357 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 357 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of a penalty (to be collectively sentenced to imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution ( Various extenuating circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant is remarkably divided into his/her mistakes, that there is no record of punishment to be particularly considered, and that the representative of Cstock company is not able to punish the defendant);

1. The proviso to Article 357 (3) of the Criminal Act;