beta
Cases
2017Do20628 A. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Measures Not Taken after Accidents)
(b) Violation of the Road Traffic Act;
(c) Violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act;
Defendant
A
Appellant
Prosecutor
Defense Counsel
Law Firm B
Attorney C, D, E, F
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2017837 Decided November 16, 2017
Imposition of Judgment
March 15, 2018
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are examined.
For reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court: (a) the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) among the facts charged in the instant case
The judgment of the court of first instance which acquitted the defendant on the ground that there is no proof of crime.
Examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the records, the above judgment of the court below is just and acceptable.
As alleged in the grounds of appeal, it exceeds the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.
No error may be found.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
shall be determined.
Justices Park Jae-young
Justices Ko Young-han
Justices Kim Gin-young
Justices Kwon Soon-il
Justices Cho Jae-chul