A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 5, 2015, while the Defendant was under the influence of 0.154% of blood alcohol concentration by services around 21:00, while driving a BchixG car and driving the two lanes from three lanes in front of D in the border of North Korea, Gyeong-si, the Defendant neglected the obligation to accurately operate the steering and operating the steering gear in the drinking state, while neglecting the obligation to accurately operate the steering direction and operating the steering gear in the state of drinking by negligence in the course of business and neglecting the center of the said car and driving the central line in the opposite direction, and driving the FHJ 125CC in the opposite direction to the right side of the said car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as cutting the upper half of the upper half of the body frame, which requires approximately 16 weeks of medical treatment from the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A medical certificate;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Notification of the results of the drinking driving control, and a report on the state of drinking practice;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the actual survey report;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 3 (2) (proviso) 2 and 8 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 148-2 (2) 2 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2 and (2), and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. are those who have been subject to punishment for drunk driving, and in the case of the crime of this case, the punishment for the crime of this case is not less than that of the defendant. However, the fact that the defendant's late or late misunderstanding is divided and reflected, the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim, the vehicle was covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, and that the defendant has been subject