(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2021.01.13 2018가단15522

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2021.01.13 2018가단15522

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The defendants share 1/78 of each of the attached list 1 to 3 real estate in the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On December 18, 2009, the network G married with the network H and had the Plaintiff and the Defendants under the chain, and died at the same time with the network H due to traffic accidents.

B. The real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “the instant real estate”) was registered as the deceased G, but the Plaintiff and the Defendants jointly owned on June 4, 2010 after the deceased of the network G (as to the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 through 3, each of the 1/6 shares in each law, and the 4/1038 shares in each law, 167.5/1038 shares in each law, among the shares in the network G, 105/1038). [The grounds for recognition] / Each entry in the evidence Nos. 2, 3, and 4, and the purport of the entire pleadings, as to the assertion and judgment of the parties on February 4, 2010.

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The plaintiff and the defendants acknowledged the inheritance shares on February 15, 2010 according to the purport that the parent's funeral had been held, and on February 15, 2010, the plaintiff and the plaintiff acknowledged the inheritance shares on 1.5 times to the plaintiff who is the parent of the parent of the parent of the parent of the parent of the parent of the parent of the parent of the parent of the parent of the plaintiff. The defendant F, who purchased and purchased the apartment house or house located in the racing city, made an agreement on the division of inherited property (the plaintiff Eul evidence No. 6; hereinafter "the agreement of this case") with the purport that he can live together with the parent of the plaintiff of the defendant F, the plaintiff had a duty to perform the registration procedure on the division of inherited property (the plaintiff of this case was divided into the plaintiff of 3/13 shares to be transferred to the plaintiff and the difference between 1/65/78 shares actually transferred to the plaintiff).

2) The Defendants asserted that they had no agreement on the division of inherited property as asserted by the Plaintiff between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff.

B. Determination Gap evidence No. 5, part of Gap evidence No. 6, witness I's testimony, and the purport of the whole pleadings as a result of the appraiser J's appraisal.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 경주지원 2021.01.13 2018가단15522

-서울중앙지방법원 2021.01.28 2019가합41155

-서울남부지방법원 2021.01.15 2020가합100346

-서울중앙지방법원 2021.01.28 2018가합517617