The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant is a person who operates a simple restaurant with the trade name D from Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and the second floor.

No one shall sell drugs, etc. harmful to juveniles to juveniles.

Nevertheless, around 22:00 on June 10, 2016, the Defendant sold 3-Clocks, a juvenile E (17) and 4 others, a juvenile harmful drug, to approximately 24,000 won, together with a juvenile harmful drug, around 22:0.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of this case, the Defendant had an intentional intent to sell alcoholic beverages to juveniles at the time of this case.

It is difficult to see and otherwise there is no evidence to acknowledge it.

① The Defendant consistently visited the restaurant operated by the Defendant even before the instant case, and was aware of E, F, G, and H as an adult at the time of the first visit, the Defendant did not verify the identification card on the day of the instant case, and confirmed the identification card against I first visited at the time of the instant case.

argument is asserted.

(2) E, F, G, H, and I have sold alcoholic beverages without confirming identification cards by the criminal investigation agency.

was stated.

However, in this Court, E, F, and G have entered the place where the Defendant had visited the restaurant operated by the Defendant as H even before the instant case, and at the time of the first visit, the Defendant presented an adult identification card that the Defendant had requested confirmation of his identification card, and the Defendant first visited at the time of the instant case.

In order to require I to verify his identification card, I presented his adult identification card.

A statement is different from a statement in an investigative agency.

(3) H and I are likely to be subject to criminal punishment if it is discovered that another person's identification card is illegally used.