Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, and for one year and six months, respectively.
except that from the date of this judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On March 11, 2014, the Defendants stated that “A notary public” on the 2nd G G G of Gangseo-gu, Daegu, 2014, “B shall pay 300 million won in advance to the J apartment reconstruction Association of Gangdong-gu, Seoul, and entered into a contract with the victim I to dispose of scrap metal arising from the process of the removal of the said apartment. At the latest, the period will end until December 2014. B invested KRW 150 million, and A invested KRW 100 million, and A invested KRW 50 million in the remainder of KRW 50 million, and would repay KRW 100 million by December 13, 2014.”
However, the fact was that it was difficult to complete the removal work by December 2014 because the date of relocation or the schedule of removal of the members of the reconstruction association at the time of the said apartment building became final and conclusive. As such, the Defendants did not have the intent or ability to repay the proceeds of KRW 50 million to the victim until December 13, 2014, as agreed with the victim, and Defendant A did not have invested KRW 100 million in the said scrap metal processing project.
From March 12, 2014, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim as above, and was transferred KRW 50 million to Defendant B’s new bank account.
The Defendant, “2016 Highest 1054” (Defendant B), while running K, operated the cafeteria without a deposit. From August 2013 to August 2013, the Defendant: (a) leased the second floor of the LA building in Jeju, and operated the cafeteria; (b) recorded the deficit of KRW 198,00,000 to the business personnel; (c) in March 2014, the enemy deepened the amount of KRW 493,00,000,000,000 won; and (d) the Defendant was unable to pay the employees’ benefits, including obligations, such as the fee for interior construction, the purchase price for food materials, etc.
On August 31, 2013, the Defendant: (a) knew on August 31, 2013, the Victim F (former M) who was in charge of the general restaurant opening-type society was missing from the said restaurant opening-type room; (b) accessed the victim; and (c) was able to divorce with the principal wife living together with the victim and make a marriage with the victim.