A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant had a mind that the victim C (V, 46 years of age) who was in the front place of her children had taken a house with his children, had frightened the victim, and had the victim detained, detained, and assaulted.

1. At around 20:30 on November 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) placed in confinement the victim at a 107-dong underground parking lot; (b) placed the victim’s head in his/her hands after completing his/her work; (c) placed the victim into the back seat of the vehicle owned by the victim; (d) put the victim into the back seat of the vehicle; and (e) moved the victim’s two descendants by her stringing the vehicle in advance; and (e) moved the said vehicle to the place of fire by driving the vehicle.

On the same day, the Defendant continued to drive the vehicle on the front of the “F cafeteria” road located in Pyeongtaek-si E at around 21:00 on the day when he was aware of the situation that the victim was able to get off the vehicle while driving the vehicle, thereby preventing the victim from getting off the vehicle for 30 minutes by driving it again.

2. In the above underground parking lot, the injured Defendant suffered from the victim’s head by hand and suffered from the wall several times, resulting in injury to the victim, such as brain, which requires medical treatment for about 21 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the case-related photograph, certificate of injury, protocol of seizure, and seizure list;

1. Relevant Article 276 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 276 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders is the first offender even though the defendant is the first offender, the nature of the crime in this case is very poor, the degree of damage is serious, and the defendant's usual attitude or accident method is not completely changed, the same crime is highly likely to be repeated even if agreed with the victim.