1. The living house of Defendant Co., Ltd.: KRW 21,928,683 and its amount from November 24, 2015 to January 19, 2016.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 5, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a construction contract with the living house, Defendant Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”) on the part of the Plaintiff, setting the construction cost as KRW 180,000,000 with respect to the construction project that newly constructs hanok on the ground C in the same year (hereinafter “instant construction project”).

B. Defendant B, who prepared a design drawing for the permission of the instant construction project, performed the supervisor’s role in the instant construction project.

C. From June 2014, Defendant Company commenced construction of the instant construction and completed the framework of hanok.

On August 2014, the Plaintiff discussed the installation cost of the Defendant Company and the roof flag with the Defendant Company. However, the Plaintiff did not reach an agreement, but did not do so.

E. On September 2014, 2014, after the Plaintiff’s Korean-style soil flag and installation, the Defendant Company took measures to prevent further felling of Korean-style houses using an apparatus.

F. As to the reasons why Han-ok's structural frame has been applied, the Plaintiff asserted that there was a cause for the Defendant to mislead the construction of the structural frame, and the Defendant Company asserted that there was a cause for the Plaintiff's excessive weight with the Korean-style soil season established by the Plaintiff, and thus, there was a dispute between the Plaintiff and the Defendant Company. Accordingly, the Defendant Company suspended the construction of the instant case around the time when it was in question

G. During the instant lawsuit, appraiser D expressed the result of appraisal to the effect that there is a defect, such as the attached appraisal result sheet, in respect of the instant construction project, and that the repair work is necessary.

H. On July 15, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendants, based on the results of the aforementioned appraisal at the conciliation date, during the instant lawsuit, are the Plaintiff’s lawsuit. 1) On the part pointed out due to the defect in the repair and reinforcement column of the basic defect parts of the construction work, the Plaintiff and the Defendants are the defect repair work (hereinafter “the instant basic repair work”).

1.2 1.2