A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the victim D, E, F, and name in the name of the victim.

Punishment of the crime

On November 1, 2011, the Defendant concluded a remodeling contract with H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “H”) for a construction cost of KRW 400 million from November 7, 2011 to December 18, 201 with respect to the Jel owned by the Defendant in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I.

In that sense, the work was conducted on the part of H, a contractor at the end of January 2012 at the construction site.

The construction was suspended because it did not pay the construction cost to the subordinate companies.

Accordingly, the defendant would be responsible for the damage K's construction work that has run from now to now, and pay it directly to the construction business operator.

As a result, from February 2012, including that the construction business operator talked to the effect that the construction business operator would cause the construction work by acquiring them, and that it was from February 2012.

4. Until the end, it stated to the effect that “The victims including the victim M will make a direct payment for the construction cost, and the Corporation will receive the loan and pay the construction cost upon the completion of the construction work,” at the Lel Remodelling remodeling construction site and the construction site in the city of the above Jel remodeling construction site and the Gyeonggi-do Government.”

However, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay the actual construction cost because he made a false statement to the K and the subcontractor in the desire to complete remodeling by resumption of the suspended construction work.

The Defendant had the victim M&M carry out a cover of KRW 12,450,00 for the construction cost, and did not pay an amount equivalent to KRW 12,450,00 for the construction cost, as shown in attached Table 1 of the List of Crimes, and did not pay KRW 213,980,00 for the purchase of the materials, and did not pay KRW 213,980,000 for the purchase of the materials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness K, N,O, M, P, Q, R, T, U, V, X,Y, Z, AB, AC, AC, and AD, witness AE, AF, and each legal statement of AG;

1. The part concerning the defendant's statement in K during the interrogation of suspect two times against the prosecutor's office

1. The defendant;