All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant 1 was guilty of the facts charged in the instant case on August 30, 2016, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment. In so doing, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the fact that the Defendant was guilty of all of the facts charged in the instant case, inasmuch as the victim’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

2) Although misunderstanding of legal principles cannot be deemed an indecent act as referred to in the crime of indecent act by force against the victim’s body, the lower court convicted all of the facts charged in the instant case by misapprehending the legal doctrine on forced indecent act, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

3) The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (an amount of KRW 6 million, and an amount of KRW 40 million for sexual assault treatment programs) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 피고인의 사실 오인 및 법리 오해 주장에 대한 판단 1) 원심의 판단 가) 원심은, 피고인은 원심 판시 범죄사실 제 1 항 기재 일시, 장소에서 손으로 피해자 F의 오른쪽 허벅지 윗부분을 1회 툭 쳤고, 원심 판시 범죄사실 제 2 항 일시, 장소에서 손으로 피해자의 엉덩이를 1회 툭 친 사실이 있을 뿐인바, 피고인은 피해자 F에게 성적 수치심이나 혐오감을 일으키는 추행행위를 하지 않았고, 강제 추행의 고의도 없었다는 피고인 및 변호인의 주장을 아래와 같은 이유로 배척하면서 이 사건 공소사실을 모두 유죄로 인정하였다.

B) Comprehensively taking account of the following facts and circumstances that can be acknowledged by the aforementioned evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the defendant can be found to have committed an indecent act committed by the victim F twice as stated in the crime Nos. 1 and 2, and such act constitutes an indecent act committed in the crime of coercion under the Criminal Act.

Therefore, the defendant and his defense counsel's above assertion.