logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.08.28 2014가합11456
회생채권조사확정재판에대한이의
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. Seoul Central District Court 2012 Ma-4365 dated January 22, 2014 (2012 Ma185).

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status D Co., Ltd. as the parties (hereinafter “D”) is the executor of the instant golf course development project in Hongcheon-gun E-ri, Hongcheon-gun (hereinafter “instant project”), and F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) is the contractor of the instant project. D is a special purpose corporation of F (SPC).

B. On December 28, 2011, D entered into a loan agreement with the Defendant to obtain a loan (hereinafter “instant loan agreement”) with a view to carrying out the instant project within the scope of KRW 25 billion from the date of withdrawal within the scope of KRW 6 months from the date of withdrawal, and the instant loan agreement includes the content that D shall obtain a loan of money within the scope of KRW 20 billion from H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “H”), other than the Defendant. However, only the content of D and the Defendant related to the instant agreement is explained.

F jointly and severally guaranteed the Defendant’s obligation of D’s above loan, and according to Article 10(2)(i) of the loan agreement of this case, the Defendant may claim F to F the performance of all or part of the guaranteed obligation under the loan agreement of this case at the same time or in sequence.

C. G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”) entered into a funding agreement with D and the Defendant on the same day (hereinafter “instant funding agreement”). Of them, the part related to the instant case is as follows.

Section 2. The Fund Supplementary Agreement G of the instant case bears the obligation to supplement the necessary funds to D in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.

(hereinafter) The method of supplementing funds under Article 3: (i) the method of lending funds required by G to D: if a proxy financial institution (I stock company) determines that a cause falling under any of subparagraphs of Article 3(1) of this Act occurs, the amount equivalent to the relevant payment amount ? the reason for supplementing funds :

arrow