beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.
The defendant pays 10 million won to the applicant for compensation by fraud.
3.2
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
In general, the telephone financial fraud organization is operated in the form of a high-level organization, such as assuming a government agency or ordering a domestic person in a foreign country, including China, to transfer the amount of damage by misrepresenting the government agency or iceing the lending of the loan, and takes part in the role of withdrawing the amount of damage, collecting the amount of money deposited in the account under the direction of the above total book, collecting the amount of money deposited from the account, receiving the money from the deposit book, and remitting the money to another place. The defendant conspired to commit the crime of telephone financial fraud with the non-phone financial fraud staff, such as taking charge of the role of receiving cash from the victim under the direction of the telephone financial fraud officer in the name of the victim.
On January 13, 2020, at around 08:50, a staff member of the telephone financial fraud assistance in the name-free statement refers to false statement to the effect that "the head of the Tong under the name of the party was used for the crime, and withdrawal of cash in the current account to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service sent by us to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service in order to verify whether the person was involved in the crime." The victim was only the defendant at the front of Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, at around 12:05 on the same day according to the order of the above person in distress, and the defendant was delivered to the Financial Services Commission under the name of the chairman of the Financial Services Commission of the above person in accordance with the order of the person in distress, and was delivered by 10 million won in cash by deceiving the victim, such as deceiving him as if he was an employee belonging to the Financial Supervisory Service."
Accordingly, the defendant was forged in collusion with a named telephone financial fraud assistance employee.