logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.15 2018가단20628
보수 청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 90,000,000 as well as its annual 6% from January 19, 2018 to April 11, 2018 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. 【Scope of Delegation” under Article 1 of the facts of the foundation (Article 1) (1) The defendant shall delegate the legal representation of the above display case to E law firms by the time the court of first instance renders a judgment

(2) When representation in the court has been explained and notified that it is a principle, and when requesting an appeal, he/she shall conclude a separate delegation agreement and pay remunerations.

【Remuneration】

A. (Advanced Payment) (1) The defendant shall pay to E law firms a sum of KRW 10 million (including additional taxes) at the same time as the retainer fee is concluded at the time when the delegation contract is concluded.

(b) (Performance Fee) ① The amount of division of property recognized on the final judgment (including both a mediation statement, recommendation for settlement, and resolution of dispute) of the court of the trial (including both a mediation statement, recommendation for settlement, and resolution of dispute) shall be assessed as 100% if the property of the client is accepted, and 30% of the total property shall be assessed as 0% if the other party is given 170,907,000 won to the other party, and the amount calculated by subtracting the contingent remuneration from the successful remuneration at the successful rate of 90,000 won if the successful remuneration is given to the other party, shall be paid as the contingent remuneration: 30,000 won if the other party is given 30% to the other party, and 30,000,000 won if the other party is given 30,000,000 won or more, and the contingent remuneration shall be paid by adding the amount calculated on the above rate to the successful remuneration).

3. The contingent remuneration shall be paid within seven days from the date the court becomes aware of the above decision of the first instance (including both a mediation statement, a recommendation for compromise, and a written decision of mediation).

(B)

A. On September 2015, the Defendant received an application for divorce conciliation from D who was his/her spouse, and entered into a litigation delegation agreement (hereinafter “instant delegation agreement”) with the law firm E (Attorney in charge) on April 2016 during the course of the instant application case, as follows.

B. On July 19, 2016, the divorce mediation was not established and implemented as a lawsuit.

hereinafter referred to as "the case."

arrow