logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.05 2014가합506343
분양대금반환
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Relevant Defendants are members of the J Urban Development Project Association located in Young-si District I (hereinafter “J Urban Development Project Association”) with the Korea Military Mutual Aid Association, and are the implementer and seller who implemented the sales business of 2,3,4 block 1,462 units among the total six blocks in the said urban development project district, and the Plaintiffs entered into a sales contract with the Defendants for K apartment located in the said urban development project district Nos. 2 and 3 block (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

(B) Defendant Appy Korea Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Apyp Korea”), Defendant Apyp Korea Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Apyp Korea”), Defendant Apyp Korea Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Apypyp Korea”), Defendant Postal Lypyd Co., Ltd.) [The details of J urban development project in the Seoul Urban Development Project District, No. 2, 309, Oct. 3, 2009; 15,53 Donghyp Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Apypyp Korea”), supply household of the size of the site area of the construction site at the time of block (land size) and the same land unit (hereinafter “Defendant Apypyd”) are the same land unit 18,333.60 underground 2, 2009; 8, 2323, 15, 15, 15, 13, 15, 15, 194

(8) The sale price of an apartment subject to the contract (Defendant) 1: (1) on May 30, 2008, No. 719,030,00 (2) on July 14, 2008, No. 702, No. 7030,030,00 N on February 20, 209 (3) on May 6, 2009 (3) on the same 30, No. 1201, No. 869, 930,00 (4) on the same 9, No. 1201, No. 1209, No. 12081, May 6, 2009; (6) on the same 30, No. 1209, No. 930, Oct. 14, 2009

arrow