Text
1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 35,00,000 and KRW 10,000 among the above amounts, from July 1, 2009, and KRW 10,000,00.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On June 18, 2009, the Plaintiff delivered KRW 20,000,000 to the Defendant, and the Defendant, on the same day, rejected the Plaintiff’s written rejection.
Amount of 2,000
H. Of the above amounts, Japan shall pay not later than June 30, 2009, and Japan shall pay not later than July 15, 2009.
b. The Plaintiff delivered KRW 15,00,000 to the Defendant on October 29, 2013, on the same day. The Defendant received the said amount on October 29, 2013 from the Plaintiff on the same day.
No later than the end of December 2013, or the end of January 2014, issued a receipt stating that the above amount should be returned to him/her before the end of the year.
hereinafter referred to as "second loan".
(i) [In the absence of a dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings.]
2. According to the above facts finding as to the cause of claim, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the total amount of KRW 35,000,000 (the total amount of KRW 20,000 for the first loan of KRW 20,000 and KRW 15,000 for the second loan of KRW 15,000) and damages for delay from the date following the due date of payment of each contract for the repayment of KRW 10,000 for KRW 10,000 from July 1, 2009, KRW 10,000 for KRW 10,000 from July 16, 2009, KRW 15,000 from February 1, 2014 to May 13, 2015, the delivery date of each complaint of this case, and the damages for delay by 15% per annum under the Civil Act for delay from the next day to the date of payment of each contract.
(The interest rate on delay under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings is 20% per annum until September 30, 2015, and the plaintiff only claims for the payment of damages for delay by 15% per annum. 3. The defendant's claim regarding the second loan is not borrowed from the plaintiff, but it is paid to the plaintiff's director's expenses, interior expenses, etc., and the receipt drawn up at the second loan is residing in the plaintiff.