1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

A. The reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows.

Except for the addition or further use as described in a port, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. 1) The following is added to the part added or used after the “transfer of ownership” in Section 12 of Section 3 of the judgment of the first instance (hereinafter “transfer of ownership in G name”). 2) On the third side of the judgment of the first instance, the following is added.

C. At around August 9, 2017, the Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against G, including a claim against G for the performance of the obligation to return unjust enrichment on the ground that G succeeded to the obligation to return unjust enrichment equivalent to the instant purchase price against D, as a creditor of G, on the grounds that G succeeded to the obligation to return unjust enrichment equivalent to the instant purchase price against D, and the court of first instance rendered a judgment dismissing all the claims of the Plaintiffs, including the aforementioned claim for return of unjust enrichment on August 9, 2017.

In response to this, the Plaintiffs filed an appeal under Daejeon High Court Decision 2017Na13609, the appellate court rendered a judgment on September 12, 2018 that the Plaintiffs filed an appeal for the said claim for the return of unjust enrichment in relation to the purchase price of this case, which they had against Eul as creditors E, and that they sought the cancellation registration of transfer of ownership in the name of G in succession with the right to claim the cancellation registration of transfer of ownership in the name of G in relation to the instant real estate in relation to G. The appellate court rendered a judgment on September 12, 2018, which accepted the claim for the cancellation registration of transfer of ownership in the name of

G appealed against the above appellate judgment and filed an appeal with the Supreme Court Decision 2018Da272445, but the Supreme Court rendered a judgment dismissing the appeal on January 17, 2019, and accordingly, the said appellate judgment is rendered.