beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The Plaintiff and the Defendants, as a company or an individual entrepreneur engaged in the provision of information on real estate auction via the Internet, provide the auction information by arranging and posting the results of auction, such as the amount of sale related to the auction of real estate, the name of the auction purchaser, the current status of real estate, and cautions, on their website while managing their Internet homepage.
The Plaintiff and the Defendant Incorporated Aid and Development (hereinafter “Support and Development”) and the Switzerland (hereinafter “SP”) paid a certain amount of remuneration to the researchers who collect auction information at each auction court throughout the country of auction, and are provided with auction information from the researchers. The Defendant AFF Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “AF”) collects auction information on the company’s Internet homepage of the auction information service company providing auction information free of charge, and the Defendant A concluded a contract for the supply of auction information with the Defendant SP and the auction information and received auction information from the Defendant SP.
The plaintiff organized and arranged the auction information on each auction case systematically and posted it on its own website by allowing users to search the auction information on each auction case in a convenient way.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's statements and images, Gap's statements and the purport of the whole pleadings, Gap's statements, Gap's statements, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 16, 19, Eul's evidence, Eul's evidence 3 through 8, Eul's evidence 1, Eul's evidence, Eul's evidence 1 to 3
2. The auction information produced by the Plaintiff and posted on the Internet homepage constitutes a database under Article 2 subparag. 19 of the Copyright Act. The Plaintiff is a database producer under Article 2 subparag. 20 of the Copyright Act.
However, between June 201 and December 2011, the Defendants on the Plaintiff’s Internet homepage without the Plaintiff’s consent.