The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence (one and half years of imprisonment, and confiscation) imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is advantageous to the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the fact that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment, etc., but the crime of this case is committed systematically against many and unspecified persons and has significant social harm. In light of the fact that the amount of damage caused by the crime of this case is considerable, the damage recovery or agreement has not been reached, the role of the defendant performed, etc., the degree of participation in the crime of this case is not less easy. There is no special circumstance or circumstance that can be newly considered after the decision of the court below, and there is no change in the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and all other circumstances that form the conditions for the argument of this case and the sentencing specified in the records, such as the following circumstances,

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, the main column of the court below's judgment's "1. AJ's statement of the police's statement of "1. T" is a clerical error in the police statement of "1. T", and it shall be corrected ex officio in accordance with Article 25 (1)