1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On April 28, 2017, the Defendant determined and publicly announced the individual housing price as KRW 341,00,000 on January 1, 2017 for Eunpyeong-gu Seoul (hereinafter “instant housing”) owned by the Plaintiff, as of January 1, 2017.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). Around May 2017, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Defendant to the effect that “341,000,000 won of the housing price of the instant house is merely one-half of the neighboring apartment price, and thus, should be raised as KRW 800,000,000.”

On June 23, 2017, the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Committee deliberated and decided that “the individual housing price as of January 1, 2017 of the instant housing is appropriate, and thus, it shall not be adjusted.” Accordingly, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff on the same day of the result of the deliberation of the said C Committee that the Defendant would not adjust the individual housing price of the instant housing that was initially announced according to the result of the deliberation of the said C Committee.

The above notice (hereinafter referred to as “instant notice”) states that “if there is an objection against the decision, an administrative appeal or administrative litigation may be filed within 90 days from the date of receipt of the notice,” and the above notice received by the Plaintiff’s spouse at his domicile on June 28, 2017.

【In the redevelopment improvement project, the right value of the instant house is lower than 1/2 of the market value, and the right value of the instant house is lower than 462,440,045 won, on the wind that is determined too low compared to the Plaintiff’s assertion of the purport of the Plaintiff’s assertion of the Plaintiff’s assertion of the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the facts that there was no dispute over the ground of recognition, the instant disposition should be revoked.

The plaintiff's notice of the result of the plaintiff's objection to the disposition of this case on June 28, 2017 as to the defendant's objection to the main defense of this case was served on the plaintiff. Thus, the lawsuit of this case filed after 90 days thereafter expired.