logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2020.02.05 2019고단62
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Attachment] On July 27, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and six years for fraud, etc. in Daegu District Court racing support on November 24, 2017 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 24, 2017.

【Criminal Facts of Crimes】 On August 18, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D that “In the “C Licensed Real Estate Agent Office” located in Dong-si, Young-si (hereinafter “C Licensed Real Estate Agent Office”) would only pay the last remainder of the payment of the deposit for the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the lease of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the sales office, and

However, in fact, the Defendant did not think that he would use the money from the victim as the name of his personal debt repayment and return of the deposit for lease of another building for lease, and did not have any other way to pay the balance. Since the Defendant did not have any means to actually demand the Defendant in spite of his statement by the victim of lease on a deposit basis, it seems that the Defendant would have guaranteed the victim the requisite for setting up against the Housing Lease Protection Act and the right to preferential reimbursement under the Housing Lease Protection Act by accepting the “registration of ownership” instead of the “registration of lease on a deposit basis.”

The defendant did not intend to make his own right to lease on a deposit basis, and the defendant asserts to the effect that the victim did not actually demand the establishment of the right to lease on a deposit basis at the request of the victim.

In this case, in order for the victim to receive the refund of the deposit for lease on a deposit basis for the apartment of this case, the victim shall have the requisite for counterclaim and preferential right to payment under the Housing Lease Protection Act without completing the establishment of the registration of lease on a deposit basis. In other words, the victim shall complete the move-in report with the fixed date

arrow