1. The sentence against the accused shall be 700,000 won;

2. The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

On August 10, 2017, the Defendant, a permanent university of 00:45, 29 at the entrance of the home plug parking lot of the road of 29 times at the university. On the taxi operated by the victim B (45), the Defendant was demanded to pay KRW 50,000,000 from the damaged person at the taxi fee, unlike the initial promise, and damaged the 100,000,000,000 won at the market price of the injured person, by drinking even glass.

Summary of Evidence

1. Written statements of the defendant;

1. Reporting on the arrest of a case;

1. A report on internal investigation and accompanying materials;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report and accompanying materials;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting a crime and Article 366 of the choice of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with respect to the instant crime is not good in light of the background, method, etc.

Although the defendant had been punished for violent crimes, he committed the crime of this case.

This is an unfavorable circumstance to the defendant.

The Defendant led to confession and reflect on the crime of this case.

The degree of damage is minor.

A injured person does not want to be punished by the defendant under the original agreement with the defendant.

This is the circumstances favorable to the defendant.

In addition, in consideration of all the circumstances shown in the arguments and records of the case, such as the age, sex, environment, and circumstances after the crime, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.