logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.10.12 2017노938
업무방해
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case on the ground that the defendant spreads false facts as if it were specialized in manufacturing I’s brand license from the defendant company, including I, and thereby interfered with customer management, including the maintenance of contractual relationship with victim D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim Co., Ltd.”) and attracting new customers.

2. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the representative director of the C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) that sells Sglass and Sglass, and the victim Co., Ltd. is a company that manufactures and sells Korean and foreign Uglass brand license.

On July 30, 2015, the Defendant only entered into a contract with the victim company to request the production of a license and to receive the license from the victim company, but did not manufacture the license, and the victim company was well aware that it manufactured and sold the license of a domestic and foreign well-known brand.

Nevertheless, from September 2015 to November 2016, the Defendant was entitled to exclusive manufacture and sale until December 31, 2015 by the victim company in the case of F, G, and H brand, respectively, and in the case of I, J, K, and L brand, even though the victim company had previously manufactured and sold exclusively before the victim company, C’s brand page -C is a group of product planning, manufacture, design, marketing strategy, marketing strategy, and distribution strategy experts.

- In line with this title, the part of the MYEWRING (production, production) of the page in question is eYEWAR, and the part of the page is eYEWAR, and the part is eYEWAR is eeled under the name of the brand called I, F, G, H, H, J, K,K and L (hereinafter “the pertinent brand”), and the defendant company spreads false facts as if it is specialized in manufacturing the letter of each brand in the above brand in the defendant company, and spreads them into the victim company’s industry.

arrow