logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.11.27 2013구합65335
손실보상청구권확인
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 280,382,160, respectively, and 5% per annum from January 14, 2014 to November 27, 2015, respectively, to the Plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. At the time of the land research project implemented before the former Decree on Land Survey (Ordinance No. 2, 1912, Aug. 13, 1912, hereinafter the same) on June 30, 1911, the Plaintiffs’ increase and decrease network A (hereinafter “Support A”) was assessed against Gwangju-gun 1,490, Gyeonggi-do’s Provisional Land Survey Bureau.

The above land became a 4,926m2 in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, following the change of land category, the change of the name of the administrative district, the conversion of the area, etc.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant land,” regardless of whether it was before or after the above change of registration.

The Plaintiffs transferred 1/7 of each of the following courses to A, and jointly inherited the evidence A at the rate of one seventh.

1) On July 25, 1912, Ministry A died, and on the same day, she solely succeeded to the net A as the family heir according to the customary law as of the same day Do. 2) D died on January 9, 1922, and she solely succeeded to the network D as the family heir according to the customary law as of the same day, she was the head and South E as of the family heir.

3) On September 8, 1947, E died in an unmarried state, and F, its father and father, solely inherited E in accordance with customary law at the time, at the time, died on March 17, 1995, and G (F’s wife) 3/17 and the Plaintiffs jointly succeeded to the net F at the rate of 2/17, respectively.

on January 13, 1961, the Plaintiffs’ brothers and sisters and F and G Slovas’ children H died without any lineal descendant.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 and 4 (including those with more than one number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2.The main contents of the legislation relating to the instant case are as follows, and the detailed contents are as shown in the separate sheet.

According to the provisions of Article 1 of the Joseon River Decree promulgated by the Decree No. 2 of January 22, 1927, "the term "river in this Decree" is deemed to be especially important for the public interest, and the name and the section of the river shall be designated.

arrow