logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.08.30 2012고합1352
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case stated that “The Defendant may see profits if he purchases a large quantity of fishery products in a foreign country directly and directly through a delivery to a customer and sells them to the customer” around October 2009, while working as the purchasing team staff of the Plaintiff F (hereinafter “G”).

However, in fact, the Defendant had the victim deposit money with the bank account operated by H, K, L operated by K, Ma operated by N, andO operated by the Defendant, and had the victim think that it would be leased to H, J, L, and N, the representative of each of the following companies, who was returned through several bank accounts, on the condition that he would receive 5% interest per month, and as the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to conduct the distribution business.

Nevertheless, on October 27, 2009, the Defendant received KRW 20,232,00 from the I’s corporate bank account by stating that “the Defendant would purchase fishery products and sell them to H” and received KRW 20,232,00 from the I’s corporate bank account. From around that time to December 30, 2009, the Defendant received a total of KRW 1,065,489,400 from the time to December 30, 2009, and acquired it by transfer.

2. According to the records of this case, the following facts can be acknowledged. A.

1) The status of the parties, etc. 1) The Victim F (hereinafter referred to as “F”).

(2) On July 2007, the Defendant established a G franchise business with the trade name of P, etc. and actually managed it up to now. (2) On August 26, 2009, after entering G, the Defendant worked as a training staff at the Agricultural and Fishery Product Distribution Business Department located in Seoul as the training staff, and from November 1, 2009 to February 201, 2010, the Defendant worked as an operating purchasing agent at G Logistics Center located in G (hereinafter referred to as “user logistics center”).

B. The defendant's report on "the increase in sales due to the distribution of fishery products", in which he/she is the proposer, is in existence of G.

arrow