1. Regarding the accident described in the separate sheet, the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. The fact of recognition that Plaintiff A is a person operating the E Hospital located in Sinsi D (hereinafter “instant hospital”), while Plaintiff B is a mythical surgery who works for the instant hospital.

On October 11, 2011, the Defendant complained of a severe brupted brupt and abrupted brush, and applied to the instant hospital.

On October 11, 2011, the Defendant was subject to the required MRI’s inspection. As a result, the Defendant’s “proving of a conical signboard between the 4-5 drilling and the 5th drilling-1000 square meters” was confirmed.

Plaintiff

B On October 12, 201, it is a form of procedure to reduce the pain of the fiber and cure the parts of the fiber, by inserting the heat using high-frequency waves to the Defendant on the 12th day of 4-5 and 5th century, where the Defendant was in a position to the core of the high-frequency disc sponsoring disc.

(hereinafter “instant surgery”) performed.

From the date of the instant surgery, the Defendant complained of symptoms, such as catherter and urine disorder, the reduction of the sense of regratium, the weakening of the resistance, the weakening of the left-hand bridge, etc., and the Plaintiff B provided the Defendant with the drug treatment and physical therapy, such as the catheric control administration.

On the other hand, on October 19, 201 and November 10, 2011, the defendant was subject to the eMG inspection by another hospital. As a result, the opinions of EMG were not observed, and the opinions of EM military units were not observed, and it was found that the eMG is suspected of neutism or a typical neutism.

On December 31, 2011, the Defendant discharged the instant hospital on December 31, 201. At the time of discharge, the Defendant was in a state that the physical exercise and the reduction of functions of sense of sense and urine and urine disorders were not completely cured.

At present, the defendant has the Mami-gun's Mami-gun's Mami-gun's Mami-gun's Mami-gun's Mami-gu's Mami-gu's Mami-gu's Mami-gu's Mami-gu'

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 5, Eul evidence 3 and 4.