logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.11.27 2015고단2729
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On November 6, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of two million won at the Seoul Northern District Court for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on March 21, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months with prison labor for the same crime, and on March 29, 2014, was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the same crime, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 29, 2014, and is still under the suspension of execution.

【Criminal Facts】

On September 11, 2015, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol not less than twice as above, and driven B Maz motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.096% on the road front of the 1.5 kilometer at the same time from the Do in front of the sowing Station located in the so-called Pari-Eup, Pari-ri, Pari-ri, Pari-ri, Pari-ri, Pari-ri, to the roads front of the Pari-ri-ri, in the same manner.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial report of an employee;

1. Making a report on the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of two Acts and subordinate statutes of two copies of criminal records, inquiry reports, judgment documents, and summary order;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. In light of the fact that the instant crime was committed during the period of suspended execution for the reason of sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act, the sentence of sentence is inevitable, in light of the fact that the instant crime was committed.

The sentence was imposed in consideration of the blood alcohol concentration in the instant case, the gender, age, family relationship (the defendant's wife is complaining of the defendant), health status, etc. of the defendant.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow