A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

[2016 Highest 2851]

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) and the Road Traffic Act is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle in C Spo-type.

On October 26, 2016, the Defendant came to proceed at a speed of about 40 km from the same side of the Water Resources Corporation to the fire station at a speed of about 40 km, along the intersection of the front of the E, located in D, at a speed of at least 01:20.

Since there is an intersection and a private-distance intersection where vehicle traffic is frequent in a commercial densely-populated area, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has the duty of care to conduct the business after checking that the traffic situation of the intersection is well reported by temporarily suspending or making a stop prior to the entry into the intersection.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so by negligence while driving the car driving on the right side from the left side of the car running in the above SPP zone, and the front right side part of the G SP car driving by the G SPP car driving on the right side as the front part of the SPP car in front of the SPP zone, and due to the shock, the Defendant was parked in the front part with the vehicle driving on the right side.

H caused the victim K (53 years old) (hereinafter referred to as the "victim K") who was parked in the I Belgium car to get the driver part after the car of the I Belgium car, and at the same time, followed the car of the victim J (30 years old) who was placed in the front part of the Belgium car, to get the kne part, and was seated next to the accident.

As a result, the Defendant: (a) caused the victim J by such occupational negligence to inflict an injury on salt pans, etc. in the part of the spawn in need of approximately two weeks of treatment; and (b) damaged the victim K to repair the said spawn car owned by the victim F, approximately KRW 1,430,00 of the repair cost.

2. The Defendant who forged a private document or the event of the above-mentioned investigation document shall be a policeman belonging to the leisure police station having called up after receiving a report at the same time and place.