A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

The execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 1, 2013, at a place where it is difficult to identify the place, the Defendant was engaged in pop-up, with access to the “China”, a trading site on the Internet, and then enclosed with the “MY 40,000 won.”

ㅎㅎ' 라는 글을 게시하고, 이를 보고 연락한 피해자 C에게 ’38,000 원을 송금하면 스마트 폰을 배송하여 주겠다‘ 는 취지로 거짓말을 하여, 이에 속은 위 피해 자로부터 피고인 명의의 부산은행계좌( 계좌번호 : D) 로 38,000원을 매매대금 명목으로 송금 받아 편취한 것을 비롯하여, 그 무렵부터 2013. 12. 29. 경까지 사이에 별지 범죄 일람표 기재와 같이 13회에 걸쳐 위와 같은 방법으로 피해자들 로부터 중고 물품 등 판매대금 명목으로 합계 1,133,000원을 교부 받아 편취하였다.

2. On August 14, 2014, the Defendant embezzled one of S2 Smartphones when galloning the market price of a taxi set up by the victim E while he was getting on or on a taxi in the Suwon-dong of Jung-si, Jung-si.

3. On January 5, 2014, at around 16:00, the Defendant: (a) borrowed observers from “G” PC located in Busan Jin-gu, Busan, from option money LTE2 smartphones with the market price of KRW 900,000,000; and (b) stolen them with matches.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police force in relation to H, I, J, E, K, L, or D;

1. Each statement of M, C, N,O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, and V;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of entry and departure transactions and the transmission and reception of text messages;

1. Relevant Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, Articles 347(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 360(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation lies in: (a) the Defendant committed fraud against many victims; and (b) the crime of larceny and the embezzlement of occupied articles was committed; and (c) the damage was not completely recovered.